[BioC] Q-values [was: SAM in R and normalization question]

[Warnes, Gregory R]

I've been debating about whether to contribute it to Bioconductor or to
CRAN.  What are the pros and cons of each?

As I see it, the q-value code is more general than gene expression, etc, so
it makes some sense to put it on CRAN.  (Why do we have two different
package repositories anyway?)

-G

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael A. Irizarry [mailto:ririzarr at jhsph.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:32 PM
> To: Warnes, Gregory R
> Subject: RE: [BioC] Q-values [was: SAM in R and normalization 
> question]
> 
> 
> how about contributing it to bioconductor?
> 
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Warnes, 
> Gregory R wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I have create a 'real' R package from John Storey's code.  
> Let me know if
> > you want a copy.
> > 
> > -Greg
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jane Fridlyand [mailto:janef at stat.berkeley.edu]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:48 PM
> > > To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> > > Subject: [BioC] SAM in R and normalization question
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I just recently saw R-function to compute Q-values given 
> unadjusted
> > > p-values on John Storey web page:
> > > 
> > > http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~storey/qvalue/index.html
> > > 
> > > I have not tried it myself.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > LEGAL NOTICE\ Unless expressly stated otherwise, this 
> message is... {{dropped}}
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioconductor mailing list
> > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> > https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> > 
> 


LEGAL NOTICE\ Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is... {{dropped}}