[BioC] hclust and (Eisen+ de Hoon) cluster3 program
bhaibeka at ulb.ac.be
Mon Dec 6 13:09:46 CET 2004
I think that the differences are too important to be due to different
implementation decisions. Actually my problem is that I have a group of
1 object and the rest in the other group when I use the 'centroid'
hclust (I use cutree to have the main two groups) and it's not the case
with other softwares. It looks like a bug in the Fortran routine but I
can not access to it.
Have you reported this "bug" before ? Can I write my 'centroid' method
michael watson (IAH-C) wrote:
>You will likely get different results from all clustering software, even
>when using the same parameters. This is because many arbitrary
>decisions have to be made during a hierarchical cluster analysis and
>different programmers will make those decisions in different ways.
>From: bioconductor-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
>[mailto:bioconductor-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Benjamin
>Sent: 06 December 2004 11:05
>To: Bioconductor Mailing List
>Subject: [BioC] hclust and (Eisen+ de Hoon) cluster3 program
>I have a problem with the R function 'hclust'. I have noticed
>differences in clustering when I use the 'centroid' cluster method with
>'hclust' and the cluster3 program (see M. Eisen and M. de Hoon).
>Have you noticed some differences too ?
>hclust from library 'stats' (Built: R 2.0.1; i386-pc-linux-gnu;
>2004-11-15 15:56:06; unix)
>cluster 3.0 using C Clustering Library version 1.25
>Thanks a lot
PhD student in the Machine Learning Group (MLG)
Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
E-mail: bhaibeka at ulb.ac.be
Institut Jules Bordet (IJB)
E-mail: benjamin.haibekains at bordet.be
More information about the Bioconductor