[BioC] normalisation assumptions (violation of)

J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk
Mon Aug 7 13:29:32 CEST 2006


Quoting Sean Davis <sdavis2 at mail.nih.gov>:

>
>
>
> On 8/7/06 6:59 AM, "J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk" <J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a set of data from an experiment where there appears to be an
>> effect of the treatment on a large number of genes. I put scatterplots
>> for 6 of the slides here:
>>
>> http://mcnach.com/MISC/scatterplots.gif
>>
>> these are Cy3 vs Cy5, in log scale.
>>
>> These show that many genes are differentially expressed, and they are
>> mostly one one side only (upregulated; some of those slides are dye
>> swaps).
>>
>> Would this appear to violate (too much) any of the assumptions made by
>> loess normalisation? Should I investigate other normalisation
>> procedures?
>
> First, I would start by doing a VERY thorough evalutation of the slide
> quality for these slides, as these are very distorted scatterplots.  IF the
> slide quality looks OK, then I would probably stay away from a non-linear
> normalization method, as these will tend to make your
> differentially-expressed genes look less differentially-expressed.
>
> Sean

Hi Sean,

thanks for your reply. The slides are good, I checked them well. The 
strong effect is not so unexpected, as it involves transfection of 
cells with a DNA-binding protein fused to a strong transactivator, so 
in theory the fusion protein could be responsible of the expression of 
a very large number of genes. There is some specificity to the binding, 
but there should be many target sites, often at promoters... So the 
effects are more or less what we expected, I suppose, and the quality 
of the slides is good. The second spike going either almost vertical or 
almost horizontal should correspond to those genes that are not 
expressed on the particular cell line, but expressed after transfection.

Do you have any suggestions of what sort of methods to use, for the 
normalisation of such experiments? Until now I used loess for 
everything, but I wasn't sure it would be okay for this experiment when 
I saw these plots.

Jose

-- 
Dr. Jose I. de las Heras                      Email: J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk
The Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology    Phone: +44 (0)131 6513374
Institute for Cell & Molecular Biology        Fax:   +44 (0)131 6507360
Swann Building, Mayfield Road
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh EH9 3JR
UK



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list