[BioC] question about U133 plus 2.0 array

Ben Bolstad bmb at bmbolstad.com
Sun Jun 24 22:34:23 CEST 2007

One possibility could be that some of your files are in a binary format
(aka version 4 or xda format) and some are in a text format (aka version
3). That would give vast file size differences.


On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:06 -0700, James Anderson wrote:
> We have some data on diabetes using U133 plus 2.0 array. One question that perplexed me is that the size of the data is very different, some are around 12 mega bytes (cel files), some are even more than 30 mega bytes, I thought same type of chip should have similar size of CEL files, why they can be so different? 
> Many thanks,
> James
> ---------------------------------
> Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor

More information about the Bioconductor mailing list