[BioC] Illumina annotation packages

Sean Davis sdavis2 at mail.nih.gov
Mon Oct 22 16:05:07 CEST 2007


Asta Laiho wrote:
> To my knowledge, the current Illumina annotation packages are based on Illumina annotation's TargetID column which means they are created for the gene profile data. In gene profile data the possibly several different probe types for the same TargetID have been averaged. However, there are usually only couple of different probe types for a TargetID. This means that averaging is not very reliable and this is why  I prefer to analyse the different probe types separately. I have also seen cases where one of the probe types for a TargetID is showing high expression values and the other is showing very low expression  values. In this case I would still be interested in the information that one of the probe types has, even the other one does not seem to work. If I would use the gene profile, the information for that interesting probe type would be  most likely lost.
> 
> The problem is that when using probe profile data, it is not possible to combine it with Bioconductor's Illumina annotation packages since they only support TargetIDs and not ProbeIds. So my question is: has there been any consideration or would it be possible to start creating Bioconductor annotation packages based on Illumina's ProbeIds as well? I happen to know how to create similar kinds of packages by myself (with AnnBuilder), but for the sake of many other users I think these ProbeId based packages should be made publicly available.

One possibility is to use the lumi package and their annotation
packages.  See the discussion in their vignette about nuIDs, which are
representations of the actual sequence of a probe.  Perhaps Simon Lin or
Pan Du will comment in more detail.

Sean



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list