[BioC] paired samples test in limma package

Yi, Ming (NIH/NCI) [C] yiming at mail.nih.gov
Tue Mar 29 23:50:31 CEST 2011


Hi, List:

I have a question regarding paired samples test in limma package.

Here is what I got

####W and B are race
####T and N are tumor and normal(paired by same Samples), respectively
####Samples are individual patients: tar$AccNum########
#### 

> library(limma);
> tar<-readTargets("Test_Desc.txt");
> mydata<-read.delim("TestData.txt",as.is=TRUE,row.names=1);
> mydata<-mydata[,tar$mRNASampleNames];
> tar$Type<-gsub("Tumor","T",tar$Type)
> tar$Type<-gsub("Normal","N",tar$Type)
> group1<-paste(tar$RACE,tar$Type,sep=".");
> group<-factor(group1, levels=c( "W.T","W.N","B.T","B.N"))
> Samples<-factor(tar$AccNum);

####first option to set up the design matrix#########
> design<-model.matrix(~Samples+group);
> colnames(design)<-sub("group","",colnames(design));
> colnames(design)<-sub("Samples","",colnames(design));
> colnames(design)[1] <- "Intercept";
> con.matrix<-makeContrasts(AA.T_AA.N=B.T-B.N,EA.T_EA.N=-W.N,levels=design);
> lmFit(mydata,design)->fit1;
Coefficients not estimable: B.N 
Warning message:
Partial NA coefficients for 26804 probe(s) 
> contrasts.fit(fit1, con.matrix)->fit2
Error in contrasts.fit(fit1, con.matrix) : 
  trying to take contrast of non-estimable coefficient
################it did not work!!! not sure why??#########


##########then I tried the 2nd option to set up the design matrix####

> design<-model.matrix(~-1+group+Samples);
> colnames(design)<-sub("group","",colnames(design));
> colnames(design)<-sub("Samples","",colnames(design));
> con.matrix<-makeContrasts(AA.T_AA.N=B.T-B.N,EA.T_EA.N=W.T-W.N,levels=design);
> lmFit(mydata,design)->fit1;
Coefficients not estimable: S14810 
Warning message:
Partial NA coefficients for 26804 probe(s) 
> contrasts.fit(fit1, con.matrix)->fit2
> eBayes(fit2)->fit3
>

#######it works somehow in terms of generating lists, but leave an warning message when I did the fit1 using > lmFit(mydata,design)->fit1 (...Coefficients not estimable: S14810) I am sure why is like this? Using some other dataset, I didn't see such warning at all. It seems dataset specific, I am not sure why there is warning here and whether the list come out is good or not.


Could someone please have some suggestions?

Thanks in advance!

Myi



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list