[BioC] using RUnit inspect() feature in package testing
pshannon at fhcrc.org
Mon Aug 13 23:56:20 CEST 2012
The RUnit inspector looks like a fine piece of work, but as I read section 2.2 of RUnit.pdf, it seems to be a programmer-exploration tool, not an automated build-time assessment and reporting tool:
The Code Inspector is an additional tool for checking detailed
test case cover-age and getting profiling information. It records
how often a code line will be executed. We utilise this information
for improving our test cases, because we can identify code lines not
executed by the current test case code. The Code Inspector is able to
handle S4 methods. During the development of the Code Inspector, we
noticed, that the syntax of R is very flexible. Because our coding
philosophy has an emphasis of maintenance and a clear style, we
developed style guides for our R coding. Therefore, one goal for the
Code Inspector was to handle our coding styles in a correct manner.
This leads to the consequence that not all R expression can be handled
correctly. In our implementation the Code Inspector has two main functional
parts. The first part is responsible for parsing and modifying the code
of the test function. The second part, called the Tracker, holds the result
of the code tracking. The result of the tracking process allows further
analysis of the executed code.
If I misjudge this, or if automated coverage calculations should appear in RUnit sometime in the future, then coverage reports would be well worth having.
More information about the Bioconductor