[BioC] [combat] par.priot=FALSE
Johnson, William Evan
wej at bu.edu
Thu Jun 13 12:55:28 CEST 2013
In practice, you only need to use the non-parameteric prior when you have a very large deviation from the parametric prior. In most cases, the results are nearly identical within a 1-2% difference in the expression values.
In your case, I would recommend just trying it and seeing if it makes a difference. If it does, trust the non-parametric.
On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Arne Müller wrote:
> I've a bias of the delta.hat parameter when looking at the prior density plots (par.prior = T). The empirical data has a long tail and therefore deviates from the normal data. Would it make sense to use par.prior=F in this case? When is the nonparametric estimate recommended?
> thanks a lot,
More information about the Bioconductor