[BioC] older version of org.Hs.eg.db

Marc Carlson mcarlson at fhcrc.org
Thu Apr 17 19:24:23 CEST 2014


Hi 1frcn,

Bioconductor packages are not intended to be cross-compatible with all 
other versions.  So if you really need to use an annotation package from 
2010, then you will need to also be running the older software that it 
was test with/against.  You can do this by simply installing the 
appropriate version of R (in this case it would be R version 2.12 that 
was run with Bioconductor 2.7) an then using biocLite() (as described here):

http://bioconductor.org/install/

Once you have set up the packages using biocLite() in this way, you 
should automatically have the old annotations installed alongside their 
matching old software.

  Marc


On 04/16/2014 05:19 AM, 1frcn at ist-einmalig.de wrote:
>     Hi dan,
>     thanks a lot for your answer! This would have been perfekt - unfortunally it
>     didn't help cause we're using our own R-packages and they aren't compatible
>     with older R versions and the older version of org.Hs.eg.db isn't working
>     with the new R version. -.-
>     So  I  guess  I've  to check my programm again and see if I can find a
>     mistake...
>     Thanks again,
>     1frcn
>
>     Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. April 2014 um 13:42 Uhr
>     Von: "Dan Du" <tooyoung at gmail.com>
>     An: "1frcn [guest]" <guest at bioconductor.org>
>     Cc: bioconductor at r-project.org, 1frcn at ist-einmalig.de
>     Betreff: Re: [BioC] older version of org.Hs.eg.db
>     Hi 1frcn,
>     this one should be close enough,
>     [1]http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.7/data/annotation/html/org.Hs.eg.db.ht
>     ml
>     with a time stamp "Packaged: 2010-10-04 18:33:30 UTC; mcarlson",
>     while there is no guarantee that this will match to the one GeneTrail
>     was using.
>     Best,
>     dan
>     On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 04:12 -0700, 1frcn [guest] wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > Hopefully this is the right mailinglist for my problem:
>     > I'm searching for an older version of the data-package org.Hs.eg.db. More
>     exactly: a version of september 2010
>     >
>     > I compared a programms output I got in R with the output of GeneTrail (an
>     online Tool). GeneTrail uses a database version from 2010-09-02. I'm getting
>     different outputs and was wondering if I made a mistake in my programm or if
>     it's just because of the different versions of the data. To exclude the 2nd
>     point I need that older version. I searched for it on the Bioconductor page
>     but couldn't find it.
>     >
>     > Thanking you for your help in anticipation.
>     > 1frcn
>     >
>     > -- output of sessionInfo():
>     >
>     > R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25)
>     > Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
>     >
>     > locale:
>     > [1] LC_COLLATE=German_Germany.1252 LC_CTYPE=German_Germany.1252
>     > [3] LC_MONETARY=German_Germany.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C
>     > [5] LC_TIME=German_Germany.1252
>     >
>     > attached base packages:
>     > [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org.
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Bioconductor mailing list
>     > Bioconductor at r-project.org
>     > [2]https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>     > Search the archives:
>     [3]http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>
> References
>
>     1. http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.7/data/annotation/html/org.Hs.eg.db.html
>     2. https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>     3. http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list