[BioC] Fwd: WGCNA: labeledHeatmap and verboseScatterplot correlations and p-values are not the same
Sindre Lee
sindre.lee at medisin.uio.no
Sat Aug 9 18:47:57 CEST 2014
Thank you! I understand now, its actually well described on the webpage
and in the documentation, I should have used more time reading before
posting.
If you have the time, I actually have a few more questions:
1. Why is the module size set at min. 30? What will the implications be
if larger/smaller?
2. Is it always better to use the step-by-step network construction and
module detection? Let me give you some details of my design so you
understand why I ask. I have two time points, from the same persons,
before and after an intervention. My immediate idea was to run WGCNA on
the time point 1, relating it to body weight. Then I run WGCNA on time
point 2, seeing if the same modules pops up. Finally, I run WGCNA on the
log-ratio ( time point 2- time point 1 ) against log-ratio of body
weight. If one or more modules shows up in all three runs, they will be
prioritised. Now, if I only use the one-step approach, no modules show
up in all three comparisons, while using step-by-step looks more
promising. However, if I mix the results, using one-step on time point
1, but step-by-step on time point 2, its even more interesting.
Thank you very much!
On 2014-08-09 18:30, Peter Langfelder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the correlations are different because the two functions, which are
> just visualization functions, visualize different relationships. In
> the heatmap you see correlations of module eigengenes with the trait,
> while the verboseScatterplot probably shows the scatterplot of
> individual gene signifcances vs. their module membership. Hence the
> number of observations in the heatmap is your number of samples,
> whereas in the scatterplot the number of observation is the number of
> genes in your module, which is typically larger.
>
> HTH,
>
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Sindre Lee <sindre.lee at medisin.uio.no>
> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have used the WGCNA package and found 2 modules which are of
>> interest for
>> me. I picked out from the labeledHeatmap (which related the module
>> eigengene
>> with clinical traits). I then selected the modules (one at a time)
>> and ran
>> the verboseScatterplot function.
>>
>> For one module its correlation was 0.51, p = 0.01 in labeledHeatmap,
>> but
>> 0.27, p<0.0001 in the verboseScatterplot.
>> How can this be?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioconductor mailing list
>> Bioconductor at r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>> Search the archives:
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives:
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
--
Best regards
Sindre Lee
Medical Research Student
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty
of Medicine, University of Oslo
POB 1046, Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
Visiting address: Sognsvannsveien 9, Domus Medica
Mobile phone: +47 46796851
E-mail: sindre.lee at medisin.uio.no;
Web page: http://www.med.uio.no/imb/personer/vit/sindrle/index.html
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list