R-alpha: Re: select.frame

[Ross &]

Peter Dalgaard writes:
 > ..and same thing applies to subst.exp itself, isn't that so? As
 > written, subst.exp would not be able to find subst.exp. Let's see:

You are right of course.  Its been a while since I tried anything
substantial in S.

 >  Maybe one should just leave it and let S solve the
 > porting problems? ;^)

Sounds good to me, but I think its an interesting enough idea to get
a bit wider exposure.  You could always mention how much cleaner it is
in R :-).

 > > 3. It might be good to check that only ":" expressions allowed.
 > 
 > Hum. I was beginning to like the idea that you could put complicated
 > expressions in there, as in

By all means.  Whatever makes sense.
	Ross
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-