Peter Dalgaard BSA
22 Aug 1997 00:48:30 +0200
Kurt Hornik <email@example.com> writes:
> >>>>> Thomas Lumley writes:
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> >> Here's something what is needed for teaching elementary statistics:
> >> Given a sample vector x, compute the corresponding ECDF, plot it, and
> >> perhaps evaluate it at points other than the data points.
> > The approx() function is supposed to do this (it currently only does
> > linear interpolation). If the right and left continuous step
> > functions were added to approx then we could easily use approxfun to
> > define the ECDF as a function closure, making it automatically
> > available at any point you want. After all, the ECDF *is* a function.
> Ah, very nice idea!
> So, we'd have
> return a FUNCTION of class (e.g.) "step" which would on the one hand
> have the right methods for it and on the other hand would allow us to
> evaluate it at new points right away?
> Martin, Peter?
Neat idea. And - hey! - someone has made it possible to assign classes
to a function now. I looked into that a while ago with a view to kill
off the antipedagogical habit that R and S has of dumping screenfulls
of gibberish on the unsuspecting newbie. At that time, it wasn't
possible so I dropped it, meaning to take it up on the list later on.
That would be like
print.function<-function(f)cat("Use 'show' to see content of function\n")
Hmm. Do we want something like this? It clashes a little with other
uses of function classes, but not badly as far as I can see.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (firstname.lastname@example.org) FAX: (+45) 35327907
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com