Peter Dalgaard BSA
03 Sep 1998 19:09:18 +0200
Martin Maechler <email@example.com> writes:
> Also, S has the much nicer extra argument 'a' with the default
> a <- if(n > 10) 0.5 else 0.375
> which leads to the behavior you cite below.
> Maybe the S authors would forgive us we just used S' version ppoints()?
> (it's S, not S-plus!)
It's one of those things that are difficult to write in more than one
Reminds me: Is there any good reason why qqnorm is not using ppoints??
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (firstname.lastname@example.org) FAX: (+45) 35327907
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com