[Rd] na.omit() (PR#889)

[ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 devoilp@dpi.qld.gov.au wrote:

> Full_Name: Peter deVoil
> Version: 1.1

There was no such version:   1.1.0 or 1.1.1?

> OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu
> Submission from: (NULL) (203.25.1.208)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> >  zz <- c(3.2, 4.5, NA)
> >  zzz <- c(3.2, 4.5, 5.5)
>
> If there are no NAs in the list:
> ---
> > length(na.omit(zzz))
> [1] 0
> ---
> I expected 3.

I get 3.

> But, if there are NAs, the correct answer is returned
> ---
> > length(na.omit(zz))
> [1] 2
> ---

I can't reproduce this in the current version (1.2.2).  Please upgrade.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._