offset arg (was Re: [R] variable scope)
Peter Dalgaard BSA
03 Aug 2002 13:29:15 +0200
> On 3 Aug 2002, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> > Another example that has come back to haunt us several times is
> > lm(...,data=d,offset=foo). The problem is that we want "foo" to be
> > found inside "d" if present, but call-by-value semantics imply that it
> > is an object in the caller's scope. You really ought to pass the name
> > "foo" (or maybe better: quote(foo), or a formula ~foo).
> Should we not just deprecate the offset argument in lm and glm? Using the
> offset() function in the formula works as one would expect (at least if
> one remembers the R rules which start at the formula's environment).
That's a definite possibility, but what about subset (the argument,
not the function) and weights?
Not to mention pch and col in plot.formula et al. where vectorization
led to some unexpected awkwardness.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (firstname.lastname@example.org) FAX: (+45) 35327907
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com