[Rd] Flat documentation?

[A.J. Rossini]

>>>>> "mark" == Mark Bravington <Mark.Bravington@csiro.au> writes:

    mark> Eventually, writers will need to put things into Rd format, though. One
    mark> thing that might make this easier, is tools that can produce Rd from other
    mark> structured document formats for which there are already easy editing tools;
    mark> LaTex springs to mind, or HTML. Tools for converting *from* Rd already
    mark> exist, according to R-exts.pdf. (There was a recent exchange indicating that
    mark> something like this used to exist for SGML, but is now broken.)

what about "prompt"?  A bit more work, maybe a few widgets (ala
Bioconductor's widgets for adding MIAME information to chips; that is,
free-text fields/paragraphs) could result in "easy" generation of
documentation.  

Or is that not simple enough?

best,
-tony

-- 
A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics		rossini@u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini@scharp.org
-------------- http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ ----------------
FHCRC: M: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW:   Th: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX
(my tuesday/wednesday/friday locations are completely unpredictable.)