Potential recompilation of certain packages

[A.J. Rossini]

And the obvious question, given the timing, 
"does this apply to 1.5.1?"

best,
-tony

>>>>> "duncan" == Duncan Temple Lang <duncan@research.bell-labs.com> writes:

    duncan> This applies to people working with the up-to-the-minute
    duncan> source taken directly or indirectly from the CVS
    duncan> repository. Changes to the mechanism for registering
    duncan> native (C and Fortran) routines in DLLs/shared libraries
    duncan> and the package level data structures mean that you will
    duncan> have to recompile any package that uses this approach to
    duncan> exporting routines. These include all of the MASS
    duncan> packages, but few others (yet :-)). No changes to those
    duncan> packages are necessary, just a simple re-installation.

    duncan> The changes allow one to specify types for the parameter
    duncan> of the routines, and also whether they contain useful
    duncan> output values when returned to R. These have the potential
    duncan> to avoid unecessary copying and are more robust to errors
    duncan> in types passed to the routines.



-- 
A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics		rossini@u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini@scharp.org
-------------- http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ ----------------
FHCRC: M: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW:   Th: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX
(my tuesday/wednesday/friday locations are completely unpredictable.)



-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._