levels() counter-intuitif? (PR#1693)
   
    rjvbertin@hotmail.com
     
    rjvbertin@hotmail.com
       
    Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:58:13 +0200 (MET DST)
    
    
  
Suppose I have a factor size with levels "small", "medium" and "large". 
Then, when I subset this factor:
>ss<-size[size!="medium"]
to get at the extremes,
>levels(ss)
....
Levels:  large medium small
The same happens with
>subset( size, size!="medium")
I understand that the resulting factor inherits the possible levels from its 
"parent", but I do not see in what that is useful. Intuitively, I would 
expect that levels(ss) return "small" and "large". For subset(), there might 
be an option to request inheritance of the number of levels.
RenE J.V. Bertin
College de France/LPPA
11, place Marcelin Berthelot
75005 Paris, France
_________________________________________________________________
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._