[Rd] could we add an argument to suppress printing of levels for print.factor()?
Martin Maechler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:04:28 +0200
>>>>> "tony" == A J Rossini <email@example.com> writes:
>>>>> "a" == A J Rossini <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>>>> "martin" == Martin Maechler <email@example.com> writes:
martin> Hence we are waiting for a new patch (:-)
a> In order to do that, I need to know what abbreviate.arg
a> (the "un-documented" argument) does. Anyone know? Other
a> thant that, it (the patch) is almost ready.
a> (yes, I'm silly -- I'd rather not fire up S-PLUS 6 when
a> doing reverse engineering...).
tony> And here's the hack; note that I've left my "argument"
tony> in for backwards compatibility.
hmm, are you serious ?
I mean it's not a very good reason to introduce an extra
argument, not S back-compatible, just because you had a local
hack with it?
I'm about to do the version withOUT the `print.levels'.
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: firstname.lastname@example.org