[Rd] maketitle.pl for Perl 4.004

ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Wed, 1 May 2002 12:27:24 +0100 (BST)


On Wed, 1 May 2002, Peter Kleiweg wrote:

> Kurt Hornik scribeva...
>
> > > In either case, you probably want to upgrade. Even 5.005 is "old",
> > > so the upgrade to 5.6.1 is probably advisable.
> >
> > Correct.  R 1.6 will unconditionally assume 5.005.
>
> I am sorry to hear that.
>
> > >> 1.4.1 instead. Can I expect this to cause any problems, for
> > >> instance when I build a package?
> >
> > > Possibly, though probably only Kurt et al could say for sure.
> >
> > As Fritz said: yes, but I'd recommend upgrading Perl to 5.005 or even
> > 5.6.1.
>
> Unfortunately, that is not an option at the moment. I guess most
> people working with R are professionals with the means to work
> with relative new hardware. I have to make do with a very old
> system, a disk drive that is almost full, so no possibility to
> compile a recent version of gcc, or upgrade anything that
> demands a C compiler that is not from last century.

I think we are almost all amateurs at computing.  Certainly most of my R
development is done on machines bought with my own money, the main ones
being 4 and 3 years' old respectively.

I think the solution may be to not upgrade R either!

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._