[Rd] print.trellis(..., draw.in=...)

[Deepayan Sarkar]

On 5/21/06, Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.  I should have realized that.  Now that I read it again with
> your explanation it is clear.
>
> At the same time it would be convenient if one could specify a viewport
> or vpPath, as well.  If that were the case we could also eliminate the
> names.* methods in this example. (These were included to encapsulate
> access to them so that the main code does not muck around in the
> internals.)

Probably true, but that's a change that belongs in grid. I don't want
to make unnecessary assumptions about grid functions and then be
caught by an API change (which is one of the reasons I don't want to
be explicit in ?print.trellis about what the 'draw.in' argument must
be).

Deepayan