[Rd] Basic Question regarding PROTECT
tlumley at u.washington.edu
Mon Aug 24 17:20:44 CEST 2009
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Saptarshi Guha wrote:
> Thank you. So the reason I wouldnt need to protect y had I returned to
> R, is because had i had done something like
> where "boo" contains y=foo()
> the assignment "<-" to h would have a PROTECT somewhere, i.e R's
> assignment is doing the protection for me.
> Had I not returned to R, I would have to do it myself.
> Yes PROTECT is quite cheap, I had thought it to be costly but 1MM
> PROTECT/UNPROTECT calls, takes <1 second (on a macbook 2.16ghz)
That's not where the cost would be. PROTECT/UNPROTECT calls themselves are very cheap, since they just push and pop pointers from a stack. Any real impact of different strategies in using PROTECT would be seen in the garbage collector.
Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley at u.washington.edu University of Washington, Seattle
More information about the R-devel