On 29/11/2009 1:39 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> 1. footnote 5, p. 52: "there is only a fine distinction between \dots
> and \dots"
>
> I should hope so :-) (from context, I think one of these should be
> \ldots instead)
>
> 2. under "\keyword{key}", p. 45: "are not part of the packages' API."
> Should that be "package's" ?
Thanks, I'll fix these.
Duncan Murdoch