[Rd] suggestion how to use memcpy in duplicate.c
Hervé Pagès
hpages at fhcrc.org
Sat Apr 24 05:58:24 CEST 2010
Hervé Pagès wrote:
[...]
> Code:
> =======================================================================
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> void memcpy_with_recycling_of_src(char *dest, size_t dest_nblocks,
> const char *src, size_t src_nblocks,
> size_t blocksize)
> {
> int i, imax, q;
> size_t src_size;
>
> imax = dest_nblocks - src_nblocks;
> src_size = src_nblocks * blocksize;
> for (i = 0; i <= imax; i += src_nblocks) {
> memcpy(dest, src, src_size);
> dest += src_size;
> i += src_nblocks;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
//i += src_nblocks;
oops, take this out!
Of course copy_ints is twice slower now but is still
about 2.5x faster than copy_ints2 (the copyVector
way) for copying a length 3 vector recycled 3.3 million
times. For a length 1000 vector being recycled 25 times,
it's about 17x faster.
Cheers,
H.
> }
> q = dest_nblocks - i;
> if (q > 0)
> memcpy(dest, src, q * blocksize);
> return;
> }
>
> void copy_ints(int *dest, int dest_length,
> const int *src, int src_length)
> {
> memcpy_with_recycling_of_src((char *) dest, dest_length,
> (char *) src, src_length,
> sizeof(int));
> }
>
> /* the copyVector() way */
> void copy_ints2(int *dest, int dest_length,
> const int *src, int src_length)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dest_length; i++)
> dest[i] = src[i % src_length];
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> int nt, ns, kmax, k;
> int *t, *s;
>
> nt = 3;
> ns = 10000000;
> kmax = 100;
> t = (int *) malloc(nt * sizeof(int));
> s = (int *) malloc(ns * sizeof(int));
> for (k = 0; k < kmax; k++)
> //copy_ints(s, ns, t, nt);
> copy_ints2(s, ns, t, nt);
> return 0;
> }
>
> Note that the function that actually does the job is
> memcpy_with_recycling_of_src(). It can be reused for copying
> vectors with elements of an arbitrary size.
>
> Cheers,
> H.
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> H.
>>
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>> "William Dunlap" <wdunlap at tibco.com> wrote in message
>>> news:77EB52C6DD32BA4D87471DCD70C8D70002CE6BFA at NA-PA-VBE03.na.tibco.com...
>>>
>>> If I were worried about the time this loop takes,
>>> I would avoid using i%nt. For the attached C code
>>> compile with gcc 4.3.3 with -O2 I get
>>> > # INTEGER() in loop
>>> > system.time( r1 <- .Call("my_rep1", 1:3, 1e7) )
>>> user system elapsed
>>> 0.060 0.012 0.071
>>>
>>> > # INTEGER() before loop
>>> > system.time( r2 <- .Call("my_rep2", 1:3, 1e7) )
>>> user system elapsed
>>> 0.076 0.008 0.086
>>>
>>> > # replace i%src_length in loop with j=0 before loop and
>>> > # if(++j==src_length) j=0 ;
>>> > # in the loop.
>>> > system.time( r3 <- .Call("my_rep3", 1:3, 1e7) )
>>> user system elapsed
>>> 0.024 0.028 0.050
>>> > identical(r1,r2) && identical(r2,r3)
>>> [1] TRUE
>>>
>>> The C code is:
>>> #define USE_RINTERNALS /* pretend we are in the R kernel */
>>> #include <R.h>
>>> #include <Rinternals.h>
>>>
>>>
>>> SEXP my_rep1(SEXP s_src, SEXP s_dest_length)
>>> {
>>> int src_length = length(s_src) ;
>>> int dest_length = asInteger(s_dest_length) ;
>>> int i,j ;
>>> SEXP s_dest ;
>>> PROTECT(s_dest = allocVector(INTSXP, dest_length)) ;
>>> if(TYPEOF(s_src) != INTSXP) error("src must be integer data") ;
>>> for(i=0;i<dest_length;i++) {
>>> INTEGER(s_dest)[i] = INTEGER(s_src)[i % src_length] ;
>>> }
>>> UNPROTECT(1) ;
>>> return s_dest ;
>>> }
>>> SEXP my_rep2(SEXP s_src, SEXP s_dest_length)
>>> {
>>> int src_length = length(s_src) ;
>>> int dest_length = asInteger(s_dest_length) ;
>>> int *psrc = INTEGER(s_src) ;
>>> int *pdest ;
>>> int i ;
>>> SEXP s_dest ;
>>> PROTECT(s_dest = allocVector(INTSXP, dest_length)) ;
>>> pdest = INTEGER(s_dest) ;
>>> if(TYPEOF(s_src) != INTSXP) error("src must be integer data") ;
>>> /* end of boilerplate */
>>> for(i=0;i<dest_length;i++) {
>>> pdest[i] = psrc[i % src_length] ;
>>> }
>>> UNPROTECT(1) ;
>>> return s_dest ;
>>> }
>>> SEXP my_rep3(SEXP s_src, SEXP s_dest_length)
>>> {
>>> int src_length = length(s_src) ;
>>> int dest_length = asInteger(s_dest_length) ;
>>> int *psrc = INTEGER(s_src) ;
>>> int *pdest ;
>>> int i,j ;
>>> SEXP s_dest ;
>>> PROTECT(s_dest = allocVector(INTSXP, dest_length)) ;
>>> pdest = INTEGER(s_dest) ;
>>> if(TYPEOF(s_src) != INTSXP) error("src must be integer data") ;
>>> /* end of boilerplate */
>>> for(j=0,i=0;i<dest_length;i++) {
>>> *pdest++ = psrc[j++] ;
>>> if (j==src_length) {
>>> j = 0 ;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> UNPROTECT(1) ;
>>> return s_dest ;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Bill Dunlap
>>> Spotfire, TIBCO Software
>>> wdunlap tibco.com
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: r-devel-bounces at r-project.org
>>>> [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Romain Francois
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:32 PM
>>>> To: Matthew Dowle
>>>> Cc: r-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>>> Subject: Re: [Rd] suggestion how to use memcpy in duplicate.c
>>>>
>>>> Le 21/04/10 17:54, Matthew Dowle a écrit :
>>>>>> From copyVector in duplicate.c :
>>>>> void copyVector(SEXP s, SEXP t)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int i, ns, nt;
>>>>> nt = LENGTH(t);
>>>>> ns = LENGTH(s);
>>>>> switch (TYPEOF(s)) {
>>>>> ...
>>>>> case INTSXP:
>>>>> for (i = 0; i< ns; i++)
>>>>> INTEGER(s)[i] = INTEGER(t)[i % nt];
>>>>> break;
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> could that be replaced with :
>>>>>
>>>>> case INTSXP:
>>>>> for (i=0; i<ns/nt; i++)
>>>>> memcpy((char *)DATAPTR(s)+i*nt*sizeof(int), (char
>>>> *)DATAPTR(t),
>>>>> nt*sizeof(int));
>>>>> break;
>>>> or at least with something like this:
>>>>
>>>> int* p_s = INTEGER(s) ;
>>>> int* p_t = INTEGER(t) ;
>>>> for( i=0 ; i < ns ; i++){
>>>> p_s[i] = p_t[i % nt];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> since expanding the INTEGER macro over and over has a price.
>>>>
>>>>> and similar for the other types in copyVector. This won't
>>>> help regular
>>>>> vector copies, since those seem to be done by the
>>>> DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR
>>>>> macro, see next suggestion below, but it should help
>>>> copyMatrix which calls
>>>>> copyVector, scan.c which calls copyVector on three lines,
>>>> dcf.c (once) and
>>>>> dounzip.c (once).
>>>>>
>>>>> For the DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR macro there is already a
>>>> comment next to it
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>> <FIXME>: surely memcpy would be faster here?
>>>>>
>>>>> which seems to refer to the for loop :
>>>>>
>>>>> else { \
>>>>> int __i__; \
>>>>> type *__fp__ = fun(from), *__tp__ = fun(to); \
>>>>> for (__i__ = 0; __i__< __n__; __i__++) \
>>>>> __tp__[__i__] = __fp__[__i__]; \
>>>>> } \
>>>>>
>>>>> Could that loop be replaced by the following ?
>>>>>
>>>>> else { \
>>>>> memcpy((char *)DATAPTR(to), (char *)DATAPTR(from),
>>>> __n__*sizeof(type)); \
>>>>> }\
>>>>>
>>>>> In the data.table package, dogroups.c uses this technique,
>>>> so the principle
>>>>> is tested and works well so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any road blocks preventing this change, or is
>>>> anyone already
>>>>> working on it ? If not then I'll try and test it (on
>>>> Ubuntu 32bit) and
>>>>> submit patch with timings, as before. Comments/pointers
>>>> much appreciated.
>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Romain Francois
>>>> Professional R Enthusiast
>>>> +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
>>>> http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
>>>> |- http://bit.ly/9aKDM9 : embed images in Rd documents
>>>> |- http://tr.im/OIXN : raster images and RImageJ
>>>> |- http://tr.im/OcQe : Rcpp 0.7.7
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>
--
Hervé Pagès
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpages at fhcrc.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319
More information about the R-devel
mailing list