[Rd] nobs() and logLik()

Michael Friendly friendly at yorku.ca
Fri Jan 20 15:19:30 CET 2012

On 1/20/2012 1:42 AM, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> One reason that I can see for people to use zero weights rather than
> 'subset' is that fitted() and predict() in the former case readily
> produce fitted values for the observations that received a zero weight.
Another is that including the case of zero weights naturally allows a 
variety of simple robust methods via a weight function that descends to 
0.  A discontinuity at 0 in the handling of weights prevents this use.

Michael Friendly     Email: friendly AT yorku DOT ca
Professor, Psychology Dept.
York University      Voice: 416 736-5115 x66249 Fax: 416 736-5814
4700 Keele Street    Web:   http://www.datavis.ca
Toronto, ONT  M3J 1P3 CANADA

More information about the R-devel mailing list