[Rd] Warning when sourcing file after require
Prof Brian Ripley
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Thu Jul 19 14:31:54 CEST 2012
On 19/07/2012 12:46, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I don't see this in R-patched; I don't have 2.15.1 installed on this
> machine. But the problem appears to be that XML exports a function
> called source() (a generic), and you're using it -- but not the current
> version, which doesn't give the warning.
Whenever you upgrade your R you need to re-install your packages. And
this is particularly true of noisome packages (mainly using the
'methods' package) which make copies of code from R itself. XML is a
are your friends. E.g.
> conflicts(, TRUE)
 "coerce" "show" "source"
 "coerce" "show" "body<-" "kronecker"
 "body<-" "kronecker" "source"
> Duncan Murdoch
> On 12-07-18 1:36 PM, David Hastie wrote:
>> I have recently upgraded to R 2.15.1. Since the upgrade, I am getting
>> some odd behaviour that I don't understand. If I source a file which
>> has a function with a require (or library) statement in it, then the
>> first time I source it behaves as expected. If I then call the
>> function (so that the require statement is evaluated) the function
>> also runs ok. However, if I then subsequently try to source the file
>> again I get an .Internal(eval.with.vis) warning.
>> At first I obviously thought it must be an error of mine in the file
>> containing the functions I had written. However, subsequent tests show
>> that even if the following code
>> cat("This is a test fn\n")
>> is put in the file foo.R, then running the following code gives the
>> Loading required package: XML
>> This is a test fn
>> Warning message:
>> In eval.with.vis(ei, envir) :
>> .Internal(eval.with.vis) should not be used and will be removed soon
>> The key part to this is the inclusion of the require statement. If the
>> require statement was not in the function, then there are no warnings.
>> I experience this behaviour on my desktop running Ubuntu 12.04 and on
>> my Mac running OSX. From looking at the change log of 2.15.1 I notice
>> that the way files are sourced has changed (and seems to relate to
>> this warning), but it is not clear to me what if anything this means I
>> should change.
>> I would be grateful for any tips.
>> Kind regards
>> David Hastie, Ph.D.
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
More information about the R-devel