[Rd] Timing of SET_VECTOR_ELT
therneau at mayo.edu
Mon Apr 1 20:54:58 CEST 2013
On 04/01/2013 12:44 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Terry Therneau wrote:
>> Assume a C program invoked by .Call, that returns a list.
>> Near the top of the program we allocate space for all the list elements. (It is my habit to use "xyz2" for the name of the R object and "xyz" for the pointer to its contents.)
>> PROTECT(means2 = allocVector(REALSXP, nvar));
>> means = REAL(means2);
>> PROTECT(u2 = allocVector(REALSXP, nvar));
>> u = REAL(u2);
>> PROTECT(loglik2 = allocVector(REALSXP, 2));
>> loglik = REAL(loglik2);
>> PROTECT(rlist = mknamed(VECSXP, outnames));
>> Can I assign the individual elements into rlist using SET_VECTOR_ELT at this point, or do I need to wait until the end of the program, after I've filled in means[i], u[i], etc.? I likely depends on whether I'm assigning a pointer or a copy.
> You're assigning a pointer, so it doesn't matter.
> FWIW, you can avoid all the PROTECTion mess if you alloc+assign, e.g.
> SEXP rlist = PROTECT(mknamed(VECSXP, outnames));
> SEXP means = SET_VECTOR_ELT(rlist, 0, allocVector(REALSXP, nvar));
> since you only need to protect the parent object.
Neat trick. I take it that SET_VECTOR_ELT returns a pointer to the object that was just
created? I haven't found a description of the function in any of the documents, only
examples of its use, so this is a surprise to me.
Lacking documentation, can I count on it in the future?
More information about the R-devel