[Rd] R CMD build then check fails on R-devel due to serialization version

Tomas Kalibera tomas.kalibera at gmail.com
Sat Jan 13 01:35:24 CET 2018

To reduce difficulties for people relying on automated tests set up to 
build&"check --as-cran" using R-devel (e.g. travis-ci), the default 
serialization version has been temporarily switched back to 2. Thank you 
for your patience - according to svn history, the last change of the 
serialization format happened 16 years ago, and unsurprisingly some 
practices that developed since did not anticipate such change and have 
to be adapted.

CRAN is now protected against packages containing serialized files in 
format 3 (which not only is not readable by 3.4.x and older, but could 
still change - the 'devel' in 'R-devel'). These new checks have to stay 
but we are looking at improving package-maintainer-friendliness. It 
turned out more difficult than just 1-2 days, hence the temporary switch 
back to version 2.


On 01/11/2018 02:47 PM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote:
> As things stand now, package tarballs with vignettes that are built
> with R-devel will not install in R 3.4.x, so CRAN can't accept them
> and someone running R CMD check --as-cran should be told that. A
> WARNING is appropriate.
> Most likely what will change soon is that build/version.rds will be
> saved with serialization version = 2 and this warning will not be
> triggered just by having a vignette. It will still be triggered by
> data files serialized with R-devel's default version = 3.
> Please do remember that the 'devel' in R-devel means exactly that:
> things will at times be unstable. There are currently a lot of balls
> flying around with changes in R-devel and also Biocontuctor, and the
> CRAN maintainers are working hard to keep things all up in the
> air. Please be patient.
> Best,
> luke
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Jim Hester wrote:
>> This change poses difficulties for automated build systems such as
>> travis-ci, which is widely used in the R community. In particular
>> because this is a WARNING and not a NOTE this causes all R-devel
>> builds with vignettes to fail, as the default settings fail the build
>> if R CMD check issues a WARNING.
>> The simplest change would be for R-core to change this message to be a
>> NOTE rather than a WARNING, the serialization could still be tested
>> and there would be a check against vignettes built with R-devel, but
>> it would not cause these builds to fail.
>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch
>> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2018 1:26 PM, Neal Richardson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Since yesterday I'm seeing `R CMD check --as-cran` failures on the
>>>> R-devel daily build (specifically, R Under development (unstable)
>>>> (2018-01-09 r74100)) for multiple packages:
>>>> * checking serialized R objects in the sources ... WARNING
>>>> Found file(s) with version 3 serialization:
>>>> ‘build/vignette.rds’
>>>> Such files are only readable in R >= 3.5.0.
>>>> Recreate them with R < 3.5.0 or save(version = 2) or saveRDS(version =
>>>> 2) as appropriate
>>>> As far as I can tell, revision 74099
>>>> (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d9530001046a582ff6a43ca834d6c3586abd0a97), 
>>>> which changes the default serialization format to 3, clashes with
>>>> revision 73973
>>>> (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/885764eb74f2211a547b13727f2ecc5470c3dd00), 
>>>> which checks that serialized R objects are _not_ version 3. It seems
>>>> that with the current development version of R, if you `R CMD build`
>>>> and then run `R CMD check --as-cran` on the built package, it will
>>>> fail.
>>> I think the message basically says:  don't do that.  You should 
>>> build with
>>> R-release for now.  You always need to check with R-devel, so life is
>>> complicated.
>>> If you build with R-devel without forcing the old format, nobody using
>>> R-release will be able to use your tarball.
>>> Eventually I guess the new format will be accepted by CRAN, but it will
>>> likely be a while:  nobody expects everyone to instantly upgrade to 
>>> a new R
>>> release, let alone to an unreleased development version.
>>> Presumably that particular file (build/vignette.rds) could be 
>>> automatically
>>> built in the old format for now, but the new format needs testing, 
>>> so it
>>> makes sense to me to leave it as a default, even if it makes it more
>>> complicated to submit a package to CRAN.
>>> Duncan Murdoch
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

More information about the R-devel mailing list