[Rd] should base R have a piping operator ?

[Iñaki Ucar]

On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 17:15, Hugh Marera <hugh.marera using gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How is your argument different to, say,  "Should dplyr or data.table be
> part of base R as they are the most popular data science packages and they
> are used by a large number of users?"

Two packages with many features, dozens of functions and under heavy
development to fix bugs, add new features and improve performance, vs.
a single operator with a limited and well-defined functionality, and a
reference implementation that hasn't changed in years (but certainly
hackish in a way that probably could only be improved from R itself).

Can't you really spot the difference?

Iñaki