[R] library for mixed GLM?

[Jim Lindsey]

> 
> Dear all
> 
> I recently had to use GLMM().  I tested both Lindsey's GLMM and
> GLIMMGibbs.  For the
> case of a random intercept I found Lindsey's GLMM more reliable.  When
> both methods
> converged the qualitative nature of the answers was similar.  GLIMMGibbs
> broke down more
> often, or I failed to tune the simulation proberly. 
> 
> However, GLMMGibbs allows for, say, two random factors, which (I think)
> was not possible
> with Lindsey's GLMM:

Yes you are absolutely right on that. Jim

> 
> I shall test this further.
> 
> regards
> 
> Helgi
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._