[R] re: GUI's for teaching
forporphyry at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 26 19:36:09 CEST 2002
Definitely 2 camps on this issue; so why not compromise with a drop-down
menu for the most frequently used processes, the user responds with the
necessary parameters for his choice, and R then writes the source statements
on the terminal and executes them. The user follows the familiar gui
procedure, is thereby automatically introduced to the command statements
involved, and R's self-documentation feature is retained.
>From: Rohan Sadler <rsadler at agric.uwa.edu.au>
>To: R Help <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>Subject: [R] re: GUI's for teaching
>Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:31:08 +0800
>This is a question to sound out possibilities.
>I am with the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences at the
>University of Western Australia, representing a few of the more
>statistically minded in the faculty. Essentially, there have been
>problems in the past with software support, changing over statistical
>software, and paying lots of money for it. In R you have an advanced
>statistical software package, it is free and it is adaptable. Also the
>maths department at UWA is using it on an informal basis and so support
>over the long term is available. The only reason why the faculty is not
>using R as a whole is because there is no GUI equivalent to
>Minitab/SPLUS/Genstat in R that can be used for undergraduate teaching
>purposes (unless I'm seriously mistaken). In RWindows there is the GUI,
>but it is not designed to carry statistical functions with buttons for
>options and this is what is needed for low statistical level undergrads.
>There is RWeb, but at this stage of development you wont find many
>takers in the faculty.
>What I want to know is this: can anyone give me a quote on what it will
>cost to develop a RWindows clone of the Minitab GUI. This GUI would
>support initially the simple six (EDA, probabilities and quantiles of
>distributions, t-tests,one-way anova, chi-square, and simple linear
>regression), and have the potential to develop into the next level of
>statistical analysis (glms, multivariate methods, time series and
>spatial - analytical problems common across our faculty). If the cost of
>development is comparable to present licence maintenance fees at FNAS
>then I think our small group can argue for its adoption. Not only that,
>the benefits to undergraduate teaching in other universities would be
>immense. If development costs are high then other faculties at other
>universities, where the software licencing arrangements are also
>troublesome, are also invited to participate in this potential project.
>I imagine this question has been discussed before, but I hope to have
>but an interesting turn to it.
>Ecosystems Research Group
>School of Plant Biology (Botany)
>Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences
>+61 8 9380 7914
>r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
>Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
>(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
More information about the R-help