[R] all.equal and names?
murdoch at stats.uwo.ca
Thu Aug 19 02:35:21 CEST 2004
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:02:02 -0400, Spencer Graves
<spencer.graves at pdf.com> wrote:
> Thanks much. I think I remember reading about both "all.equal"
>and "identical" in Venables and Ripley (2002) MASS. Unfortunately, I
>don't have MASS handy now, and I could not find it otherwise, so I asked.
> What needs to happen to upgrade the "all.equal" documentation to
>add "identical" to the "see also"?
I just did it. It was there in the text, but should also have been in
In general to get something added to the docs, the best way is to
collect a few similar things, classify them as doc errors, suggested
improvements, etc, and post them to R-devel (if you're not sure
they'll be accepted) or to R-bugs (if they are sure things). It's
definitely best to submit suggested replacement text.
More information about the R-help