[R] Is R good for not-professional-statistician, un-mathematical clinical researchers?
Jacob Wegelin
jawegelin at ucdavis.edu
Thu Aug 19 08:45:05 CEST 2004
Alternate title: How can I persuade my students that R is for them?
Alternate title: Can R replace SAS, SPSS or Stata for clinicians?
I am teaching introductory statistics to twelve physicians and two veterinarians
who have enrolled in a Mentored Clinical Research Training Program. My course is the
first in a sequence of three. We (the instructors of this sequence) chose to teach
R rather than some other computing environment.
My (highly motivated) students have never encountered anything like R. One frankly
asked:
"Do you feel (honestly) that a group of physicians (with two vets) clinicians will
be able to effectively use and actually understand R? If so, I will happily call this
bookstore and order this book [Venables and Ripley] tomorrow."
I am heavily biased toward R/S because I have used it since the first applied statistics
course I took. But I would love to give these students some kind of objective information
about the usability of R by non-statisticians--not just my own bias.
Could anyone suggest any such information? Or does anyone on this list use R who is
a clinician and not really mathematically savvy? For instance, someone who doesn't
remember any math beyond algebra and doesn't think in terms of P(A|B)?
Or have we done a disservice to our students by choosing to make them
learn R, rather than making ourselves learn SAS, Stata or SPSS?
Thank you for any ideas
Jake Wegelin
More information about the R-help
mailing list