[R] Testing for S4 objects (redux)

John Fox jfox at mcmaster.ca
Sun Dec 5 05:37:50 CET 2004


Dear Spencer,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Graves [mailto:spencer.graves at pdf.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:00 PM
> To: John Fox
> Cc: 'John Chambers'; r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch; 'Martin Maechler'
> Subject: Re: [R] Testing for S4 objects (redux)
> 
>       Which version of R? 
> 

Sorry -- this was with R 2.0.1 under Windows.

John

>       I just replicated it in R 2.0.0patched.  I know that 
> 2.0.1 is now available, but I haven't found time to upgrade yet. 
> 
>       By the way, I can replicate the error message with only 
> one line: 
> 
>  > getClass("by")
> Error in getClass("by") : "by" is not a defined class
> 
>       hope this helps.  spencer graves
> 
> John Fox wrote:
> 
> >Dear John,
> >
> >I've encountered the following problem:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>x <- rnorm(100)
> >>y <- sample(2, 100, replace=TRUE)
> >>res <- by(x, y, mean)
> >>res
> >>    
> >>
> >INDICES: 1
> >[1] 0.1129494
> >------------------------------------------------------------
> >INDICES: 2
> >[1] -0.2066684
> >  
> >
> >>isS4object <- function(object)(length(attr(object, "class"))==1 &&
> >>    
> >>
> >+  !is.null(getClass(class(object))))
> >  
> >
> >>isS4object(res)
> >>    
> >>
> >Error in getClass(class(object)) : "by" is not a defined class
> >  
> >
> >
> >For a simple question, this has gotten rather complicated. Any 
> >suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> >Regards,
> > John
> >
> >--------------------------------
> >John Fox
> >Department of Sociology
> >McMaster University
> >Hamilton, Ontario
> >Canada L8S 4M4
> >905-525-9140x23604
> >http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
> >--------------------------------
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: John Chambers [mailto:johnmchambers at gmail.com]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:40 AM
> >>To: John Fox
> >>Cc: Martin Maechler; r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> >>Subject: Re: [R] Testing for S4 objects
> >>
> >>Let me suggest a different test, because slotNames was 
> written to work 
> >>differently when given a string or a class definition.  With your 
> >>definition,
> >>
> >>R> x <- "classRepresentation"
> >>R> isS4object(x)
> >>[1] TRUE
> >>
> >>which I assume is not what you wanted.  (Given a single string,
> >>slotNames() tries to look up the class definition of that name.)
> >>
> >>How about the following?  The logic is that an S4 object 
> must have an 
> >>actual class attribute of length 1 (that rules out basic 
> data types, 
> >>where class(x) is a string but there is no actual 
> attribute, and also 
> >>rules out some S3 objects).  Then if that's true, try to 
> look up the 
> >>class definition.  If it is non-null, seems like an S4 object.
> >>
> >>R> isS4object <- function(object)(length(attr(object, 
> "class"))==1 &&
> >>+     !is.null(getClass(class(object))))
> >>R> isS4object(x)
> >>[1] FALSE
> >>R> isS4object(getClass(class(x)))
> >>[1] TRUE
> >>
> >>This definition seems to work, at least on the examples I 
> could think 
> >>of right away.  Notice though, that some classes, such as 
> "ts", that 
> >>have been around for a long while are nevertheless legitimate S4 
> >>classes, so:
> >>
> >>R> t1 = ts(1:12)
> >>R> isS4object(t1)
> >>[1] TRUE
> >>
> >>(this applies to either version of isS4object).
> >>
> >>There are a couple of details, more appropriate for the 
> r-devel list. 
> >>Seems  a good candidate for a function to add to R.
> >>
> >>
> >>On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:48:30 -0500, John Fox 
> <jfox at mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Dear Martin,
> >>>
> >>>As it turns out, the test that I proposed (i.e., testing for NULL
> >>>slotNames) sometimes fails. For example:
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>library(car)
> >>>>data(Prestige)
> >>>>sum <- summary(lm(prestige ~ income + education, data=Prestige))
> >>>>slotNames(sum)
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>character(0)
> >>>
> >>>The following, however, seems to work (at least as far as 
> I've been 
> >>>able to
> >>>ascertain):
> >>>
> >>>isS4object <- function(object) length(slotNames(object)) != 0
> >>>
> >>>I hope that this is a more robust test.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>John
> >>>
> >>>--------------------------------
> >>>John Fox
> >>>Department of Sociology
> >>>McMaster University
> >>>Hamilton, Ontario
> >>>Canada L8S 4M4
> >>>905-525-9140x23604
> >>>http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
> >>>--------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: Martin Maechler [mailto:maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch]
> >>>>Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 3:18 AM
> >>>>To: John Fox
> >>>>Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> >>>>Subject: Re: [R] Testing for S4 objects
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>"JohnF" == John Fox <jfox at mcmaster.ca>
> >>>>>>>>>    on Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:28:50 -0500 writes:
> >>>>>>>>>                  
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>    JohnF> Dear r-help list members, Is there a way to test
> >>>>    JohnF> whether an object is an S4 object? The best that I've
> >>>>    JohnF> been able to come up with is
> >>>>
> >>>>    JohnF>    isS4object <- function(object)
> >>>>!(is.null(slotNames(object)))
> >>>>
> >>>>you can drop one pair of "(..)" to give
> >>>>
> >>>>  isS4object <- function(object) !is.null(slotNames(object))
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>    JohnF> which assumes that an S4 object has at least one
> >>>>    JohnF> slot. I think this is safe, but perhaps I'm missing
> >>>>    JohnF> something.
> >>>>
> >>>>The question is a very good one -- that I have posed to R-core a 
> >>>>while ago myself.
> >>>>
> >>>>Inside  utils:::str.default  {which doesn't show the many
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>commments
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>in the *source* of str.default()}, I have wanted a way that even 
> >>>>works when the 'methods' package is not attached and use the more 
> >>>>obscure
> >>>>
> >>>>    #NOT yet:if(has.class <- !is.null(cl <- class(object)))
> >>>>    if(has.class <- !is.null(cl <- attr(object, "class")))#
> >>>>S3 or S4 class
> >>>>      S4 <- !is.null(attr(cl, "package"))## <<<'kludge' FIXME!
> >>>>      ##or length(methods::getSlots(cl)) > 0
> >>>>
> >>>>For the time being, I'd keep your function, but I don't
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>think we'd
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>guarantee that it will remain the appropriate test in all
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>future.  
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>But till then many things will have happened (if not all of them 
> >>>>;-).
> >>>>
> >>>>Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>______________________________________________
> >>>R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list 
> >>>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> >>>PLEASE do read the posting guide! 
> >>>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >______________________________________________
> >R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> >PLEASE do read the posting guide! 
> >http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >  
> >
> 
> --
> Spencer Graves, PhD, Senior Development Engineer
> O:  (408)938-4420;  mobile:  (408)655-4567
> 
>




More information about the R-help mailing list