[R] Is there a better way than x[1:length(x)-1] ?
Petr Pikal
petr.pikal at precheza.cz
Thu Aug 10 12:01:29 CEST 2006
Hi
On 9 Aug 2006 at 17:30, John McHenry wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: John McHenry <john_d_mchenry at yahoo.com>
To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [R] Is there a better way than x[1:length(x)-1] ?
> Hi WizaRds,
>
> In MATLAB you can do
>
> x=1:10
>
> and then specify
>
> x(2:end)
>
> to get
>
> 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
>
> or whatever (note that in MATLAB the parenthetic index notation is
> used, not brackets as in R). The point is that 'end' allows you to
> refer to the final index point of the array.
>
> Obviously there isn't much gain in syntax when the variable name is x,
> but when it's something like
>
> hereIsABigVariableName(j:end-i)
>
> it makes things a lot more readable than
>
> hereIsABigVariableName(j:length(hereIsABigVariableName)-i)
>
> In R I could do:
>
> n<- length(hereIsABigVariableName)
> hereIsABigVariableName[j:n-i]
>
> but I'd like to use something like 'end', if it exists.
It probably does not exist (but in R you never know :-)
and you can easily to construct it yourself
x <- 1:10
end <- function(x) length(x)
x[2:end(x)]
[1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
>
HTH
Petr
>
> Am I missing something obvious in R that does what 'end' does in
> MATLAB?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jack.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented,
> minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Petr Pikal
petr.pikal at precheza.cz
More information about the R-help
mailing list