[R] Floating point imprecision in sum() under R-2.3.1?
Roger D. Peng
rdpeng at gmail.com
Fri Aug 18 21:36:49 CEST 2006
I think you want to look at
sum(x)/2066.758 - 1
which on my Linux box is 2.2e-16.
Brahm, David wrote:
> After upgrading to R-2.3.1 on Linux Redhat, I was suprised by this:
> R> x <- c(721.077, 592.291, 372.208, 381.182)
> R> sum(x) - 2066.758
>  4.547474e-13
> Now I understand that floating point arithmetic is not precise, but
> 1) the result is exactly 0 in R-2.2.1 (patched) on the same machine,
> 2) .Machine$double.eps = 2.2e-16, so the error seems quite large.
> Also note I get the same result on R-2.3.1 under Windows, and that
> R> (721.077 + 592.291 + 372.208 + 381.182) - 2066.758
>  0
> Is this related to the (2.3.0) NEWS item:
> sum(), prod(), mean(), rowSums() and friends use a long double
> accumulator where available and so may be more accurate.
> and should I be concerned? Thanks.
> -- David Brahm (brahm at alum.mit.edu)
> platform = i686-pc-linux-gnu
> arch = i686
> os = linux-gnu
> system = i686, linux-gnu
> status =
> major = 2
> minor = 3.1
> year = 2006
> month = 06
> day = 01
> svn rev = 38247
> language = R
> version.string = Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01)
> Search Path:
> .GlobalEnv, package:methods, package:stats, package:graphics,
> package:grDevices, package:utils, package:datasets, Autoloads,
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Roger D. Peng | http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/
More information about the R-help