[R] Suggestion for big files [was: Re: A comment about R:]

Prof Brian Ripley ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Fri Jan 6 12:08:23 CET 2006


On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Martin Maechler wrote:

>>>>>> "FrPi" == François Pinard <pinard at iro.umontreal.ca>
>>>>>>     on Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:41:21 -0500 writes:
>
>    FrPi> [Brian Ripley]
>    >> I rather thought that using a DBMS was standard practice in the
>    >> R community for those using large datasets: it gets discussed rather
>    >> often.
>
>    FrPi> Indeed.  (I tried RMySQL even before speaking of R to my co-workers.)
>
>    >> Another possibility is to make use of the several DBMS interfaces already
>    >> available for R.  It is very easy to pull in a sample from one of those,
>    >> and surely keeping such large data files as ASCII not good practice.
>
>    FrPi> Selecting a sample is easy.  Yet, I'm not aware of any
>    FrPi> SQL device for easily selecting a _random_ sample of
>    FrPi> the records of a given table.  On the other hand, I'm
>    FrPi> no SQL specialist, others might know better.
>
>    FrPi> We do not have a need yet for samples where I work,
>    FrPi> but if we ever need such, they will have to be random,
>    FrPi> or else, I will always fear biases.
>
>    >> One problem with Francois Pinard's suggestion (the credit has got lost)
>    >> is that R's I/O is not line-oriented but stream-oriented.  So selecting
>    >> lines is not particularly easy in R.
>
>    FrPi> I understand that you mean random access to lines,
>    FrPi> instead of random selection of lines.  Once again,
>    FrPi> this chat comes out of reading someone else's problem,
>    FrPi> this is not a problem I actually have.  SPSS was not
>    FrPi> randomly accessing lines, as data files could well be
>    FrPi> hold on magnetic tapes, where random access is not
>    FrPi> possible on average practice.  SPSS reads (or was
>    FrPi> reading) lines sequentially from beginning to end, and
>    FrPi> the _random_ sample is built while the reading goes.
>
>    FrPi> Suppose the file (or tape) holds N records (N is not
>    FrPi> known in advance), from which we want a sample of M
>    FrPi> records at most.  If N <= M, then we use the whole
>    FrPi> file, no sampling is possible nor necessary.
>    FrPi> Otherwise, we first initialise M records with the
>    FrPi> first M records of the file.  Then, for each record in
>    FrPi> the file after the M'th, the algorithm has to decide
>    FrPi> if the record just read will be discarded or if it
>    FrPi> will replace one of the M records already saved, and
>    FrPi> in the latter case, which of those records will be
>    FrPi> replaced.  If the algorithm is carefully designed,
>    FrPi> when the last (N'th) record of the file will have been
>    FrPi> processed this way, we may then have M records
>    FrPi> randomly selected from N records, in such a a way that
>    FrPi> each of the N records had an equal probability to end
>    FrPi> up in the selection of M records.  I may seek out for
>    FrPi> details if needed.
>
>    FrPi> This is my suggestion, or in fact, more a thought that
>    FrPi> a suggestion.  It might represent something useful
>    FrPi> either for flat ASCII files or even for a stream of
>    FrPi> records coming out of a database, if those effectively
>    FrPi> do not offer ready random sampling devices.
>
>
>    FrPi> P.S. - In the (rather unlikely, I admit) case the gang
>    FrPi> I'm part of would have the need described above, and
>    FrPi> if I then dared implementing it myself, would it be welcome?
>
> I think this would be a very interesting tool and
> I'm also intrigued about the details of the algorithm you
> outline above.

It's called `reservoir sampling' and is described in my simulation book 
and Knuth and elsewhere.

> If it would be made to work on all kind of read.table()-readable
> files, (i.e. of course including *.csv);   that might be a valuable
> tool for all those -- and there are many -- for whom working
> with DBMs is too daunting initially.

It would be better (for the reasons I gave) to do this in a separate file 
preprocessor: read.table reads from a connection not a file, of course.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


More information about the R-help mailing list