[R] a question regarding 'lrm'

Uwe Ligges ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de
Tue Oct 3 18:34:21 CEST 2006


This is a bug in Design which has already been reported to this list. 
Please report bugs to the corresponding package maintainers directly.

Uwe Ligges


Tao Shi wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> I don't understand why 'lrm' doesn't recognize the '~.' formula.  I'm pretty sure it was working before. Please see below:
> 
> I'm using R2.3.0, WinXP, Design 2.0-12
> 
> thanks,
> ...Tao
> 
>> dat <- data.frame(y=factor(rep(1:2,each=50)), x1=rnorm(100), x2=rnorm(100), x3=rnorm(100))
>> lrm(y~., data=dat, x=T, y=T)
> Error in terms.formula(formula, specials = "strat") : 
>         '.' in formula and no 'data' argument
>> lrm(y~x1+x2+x3, data=dat, x=T, y=T)
> 
> Logistic Regression Model
> 
> lrm(formula = y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = dat, x = T, y = T)
> 
> 
> Frequencies of Responses
>  1  2 
> 50 50 
> 
>        Obs  Max Deriv Model L.R.       d.f.          P          C        Dxy      Gamma 
>        100      1e-08       3.61          3     0.3066      0.594      0.187      0.188 
>      Tau-a         R2      Brier 
>      0.095      0.047      0.241 
> 
>           Coef     S.E.   Wald Z P     
> Intercept -0.05224 0.2071 -0.25  0.8009
> x1        -0.30699 0.1952 -1.57  0.1159
> x2         0.08093 0.2171  0.37  0.7093
> x3         0.21450 0.2247  0.95  0.3398
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



More information about the R-help mailing list