[R] Simple question about function with glm
bolker at zoo.ufl.edu
Mon May 7 05:58:52 CEST 2007
<Bill.Venables <at> csiro.au> writes:
> Finally, I'm a bit puzzled why you use glm() when the simpler lm() would
> have done the job. You are fitting a linear model and do not need the
> extra paraphernaila that generalized linear models require.
> Bill Venables.
Perhaps the original poster is confused about the difference
between general (a la PROC GLM) and generalized (glm) linear
The code is also a little puzzling because the same tests
seem to be run whether p>0.05 or not. Perhaps the code
will eventually be written to log-transform the data
if it fails the normality test?
[ hint: ?boxcox in the MASS package might be a better way
to go ]
More information about the R-help