[R] Fwd: Re: shell.exec() on Windows, unexpected behavior
murdoch at stats.uwo.ca
Sat May 12 14:07:14 CEST 2007
On 11/05/2007 11:28 PM, Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
> Duncan is on the right track.
> In the CMD window
> start "c:\Program Files\R\R-2.5.0\doc\manual\R-admin.pdf"
> opens another CMD window with the quoted string as title.
> In the CMD window
> start c:\Progra~1\R\R-2.5.0\doc\manual\R-admin.pdf
> (with the 8.3 name and no embedded blanks) opens Adobe Reader 8
You could also do
start "title" "c:\Program Files\R\R-2.5.0\doc\manual\R-admin.pdf"
I'd never noticed that start sees the quotes as syntactically
meaningful. Weird people work at Microsoft.
> Windows Explorer shows the Adobe 6 icon by the PDF files.
> The Windows Explorer right-click menu shows three actions
> Open with Adobe Reader 8
> The "Open" item uses Adobe Acrobat 6.
> The "Tools/Folder Options/File Types" menu shows and Adobe 6
> icon. The details sections shows the Adobe 8 icon. The "Advanced"
> button shows three actions
> Open with Acrobat 6
> I attempted to edit the "Open with Acrobat 6" to "Open with
> Acrobat 8". It didn't take. So I did a restore. I will now
> just have an open Acrobat 8 around when I care which version is
If you want to try again, this stuff is all controlled in the registry
within HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AcroExch.Document\shell, at least in Acrobat 5,
which I've got. The various options "open", "print", "printto" would
normally be stored there, for example with
"C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 5.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe" "%1"
(on my system). The trouble with this kind of editing is that programs
could instead install CLSID values, and then you won't see the "open",
"print", "printto" choices.
Before you make changes to these things with regedit, I'd recommend
exporting the branch so you can restore it if things go badly.
> I am guessing that Adobe Reader 8 (a read-only program) saw that
> Adobe Acrobat 6 (a read/write program) was installed. Therefore
> it assumed that the user would want the write potential of the
> older program to take precedence over the read-only potential of
> the newer program. It looks to me like there are some inconsistencies
> in how it made those arrangements.
> ---- Original message ----
>> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:14:31 -0400
>> From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch at stats.uwo.ca>
>> shell.exec("foo.pdf") does the same thing that "start foo.pdf" would do
>>from a Windows command line. Do you see the same behaviour there? I
>> think this is also usually the same thing as a right click Open does,
>> but that may be changeable.
>> What may be happening is that Acrobat has installed some fancy shell
>> extension that doesn't execute an "open" on the file, it does something
>> else instead.
>> Duncan Murdoch
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help