[R] shapiro wilk normality test

[Charles Annis, P.E.]

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485

Charles Annis, P.E.

Charles.Annis at StatisticalEngineering.com
phone: 561-352-9699
eFax:  614-455-3265
http://www.StatisticalEngineering.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Ted Harding
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 10:56 AM
To: Frank E Harrell Jr
Cc: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] shapiro wilk normality test

On 13-Jul-08 13:29:13, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
> [...]
> A large P-value means nothing more than needing more data.  No 
> conclusion is possible.  Please read the classic paper Absence of 
> Evidence is not Evidence for Absence.

Is that ironic, Frank, or is there really a "classic paper" with
that title? If so, I'd be pleased to have a reference to it!

Thanks,
Ted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 13-Jul-08                                       Time: 15:55:35
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------

______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.