[R] sciplot question
jarle at bjorgeengen.net
Mon May 25 09:05:35 CEST 2009
On May 24, 2009, at 4:42 , Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
> Jarle Bjørgeengen wrote:
>> On May 24, 2009, at 3:34 , Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
>>> Jarle Bjørgeengen wrote:
>>>> thanks Manuel.
>>>> Just for curiosity, any particular reason you chose standard
>>>> error , and not confidence interval as the default (the naming of
>>>> the plotting functions associates closer to the confidence
>>>> interval .... ) error indication .
>>>> - Jarle Bjørgeengen
>>>> On May 24, 2009, at 3:02 , Manuel Morales wrote:
>>>>> You define your own function for the confidence intervals. The
>>>>> needs to return the two values representing the upper and lower CI
>>>>> values. So:
>>>>> qt.fun <- function(x) qt(p=.975,df=length(x)-1)*sd(x)/
>>>>> my.ci <- function(x) c(mean(x)-qt.fun(x), mean(x)+qt.fun(x))
>>> Minor improvement: mean(x) + qt.fun(x)*c(-1,1) but in general
>>> confidence limits should be asymmetric (a la bootstrap).
>> if the date is normally distributed , symmetric confidence interval
>> should be ok , right ?
> Yes; I do see a normal distribution about once every 10 years.
Is it not true that the students-T (qt(... and so on) confidence
intervals is quite robust against non-normality too ?
A teacher told me that, the students-T symmetric confidence intervals
will give a adequate picture of the variability of the data in this
More information about the R-help