[R] R's documentation
ggrothendieck at gmail.com
Fri May 29 18:40:59 CEST 2009
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Zheng, Xin (NIH) [C]
<zhengxin at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> Sometimes I get confused with R's documentation. It seems the documents is not maintained and updated well. Anyone has similar feeling? I don't mean to offend anyone. I hope R would get better and better. But documentation is really one very important factor which could attract people coming or drive people away.
The svn log shows when each file was updated and its pretty
clear that they are constantly being updated.
There are third party introductions and many books available.
More information about the R-help