[R] Strange behavior with poisosn and glm

(Ted Harding) Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk
Tue Mar 2 09:47:13 CET 2010


On 02-Mar-10 08:02:27, Noah Silverman wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm just learning about poison links for the glm function.
> 
> One of the data sets I'm playing with has several of the
> variables as factors (i.e. month, group, etc.)
> 
> When I call the glm function with a formula that has a factor
> variable, R automatically converts the variable to a series of
> variables with unique names and binary values.
> 
> For example, with this pseudo data:
> 
> y        v1        month
> 2        1            january
> 3        1.4        februrary
> 1.5    6.3        february
> 1.2    4.5        january
> 5.5    4.0        march
> 
> I use this call:
> 
> m <- glm(y ~ v1 + month, family="poisson")
> 
> R gives me back a model with variables of
> Intercept
> v1
> monthJanuary
> monthFebruary
> monthMarch
> 
> I'm concerned that this might be doing some strange things
> to my model.
> Can anyone offer some enlightenment?
> Thanks!

The creation of auxiliary variables is the way to incorporate
a factor variable into a model. These are usually called
"dummy variables", and are essentially indicator variables.

Your data above would correspond to variables I (for Intercept),
J (for January), F (for February) and M (for March) in addition
to the other variables y and v1 as below:

  y      v1    I   J   F   M   #   month
  2      1     1   1   0   0   #  january
  3      1.4   1   0   1   0   #  februrary
  1.5    6.3   1   0   1   0   #  february
  1.2    4.5   1   1   0   0   #  january
  5.5    4.0   1   0   0   1   #  march

The linear predictor L in the model for y would then be

  L = a*I + b*v1 + c1*J + c2*F + c3*J

evaluated arithmetically; e.g. for row 2 of the data it is

  a + b*1.4 + c2

However, as given, J + F + M = I, so there is redundancy in
the variables, since there are only three independent values
there  (not so if you exclude the Intercept using a model
formula y ~ v1 + month - 1), so R will provide estimates
which are computed in terms of some pattern of differences
between these four variables called contrasts. Different
patterns of difference present different representations
of the three independent aspects.

There are many different kinds of contrasts available.
One of these will be chosen as default by R (depending in
particular on whether the factor variable is being used
as an ordered factor or an unordered factor). See ?contrasts
for an outline of what is there, ?contrast for more detail,
and look at the help for particular contrasts such as
?contr.helmert, ?contr.poly, ?contr.sum, ?contr.treatment.

After all that: No, R is not doing strange things to your model!

ted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 02-Mar-10                                       Time: 08:47:11
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------



More information about the R-help mailing list