[R] The difference between SAS and R

Greg Snow 538280 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 26 22:12:09 CET 2013


When I first saw that comic, my thought was "where would APL fit in
that graph?" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language))

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:00 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 20 Dec 2013, at 18:53 , Kevin Wright <kw.stat at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> SAS uses words.  R uses symbols.
>>
>> See this:
>> http://xkcd.com/1306/
>>
>> (Yes, I know IML uses plenty of symbols.  It's just supposed to be funny.
>> And somewhat true.)
>>
>
> Actually, R is on par with C++ when it comes to _prefixed_ symbols like #missedthepoint, which is what the XKCD strip is about. In terms of general operators, SAS would be approaching COBOL (famous for "ADD YEARS TO AGE" like construct) were it not for the DATA step and the %MACRO language.
>
> (The preceding XKCD (1305) is quite nice, by the way.)
>
>> --
>> Kevin Wright
>>
>>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> --
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



-- 
Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
538280 at gmail.com



More information about the R-help mailing list