[R] minor version upgrade requires library refresh?
ross at biostat.ucsf.edu
Tue Feb 18 18:13:45 CET 2014
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 17:47 -0800, David Winsemius wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > If R changes from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2, or more generally from m.n.p to m.n.q,
> > is it necessary to refresh libraries to match the version, e.g., with
> > update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE)? The R Windows FAQ 2.8 says
> > "For those with a personal library (folder R\win-library\x.y of your
> > home directory, R\win64-library\x.y on 64-bit builds), you will need to
> > update that too when the minor version of R changes (e.g. from 3.0.2 to
> > 3.1.0)."
> When "n" changes you need to update any existing library.
> > This suggests that in m.n.q n is the minor version (which would make q
> > the release?), and that the minor version does not change between 3.0.1
> > and 3.0.1.
The FAQ refers to the "minor version" but does not define it, except by
example. I'm trying to figure out if a change in p in m.n.p counts as a
change in the minor version number, and hence requires a library update.
I considered p a minor version number (e.g., in the subject line of the
message) and so found the FAQ ambiguous.
Both your rule ("when n changes...") and the docs suggest p does not
count as a minor version number, though neither is explicit. Logically,
the fact that a change in n requires library updates provides no
information about a change in p, though the usual reading is "p doesn't
matter" or "when m.n stays the same no update is necessary."
More information about the R-help