[R] dependent column(s) in data frame

David Winsemius dwinsemius at comcast.net
Fri Feb 21 22:04:30 CET 2014


On Feb 19, 2014, at 11:19 AM, PQuery wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I have a data frame with a status column and some condition columns. (a dput
> of part of it is listed below).
> I would like to know if:
> 
> 1) There are more chances to have a "status" of "1" when more than one
> conditions have the value of "1" ?   
> 
> 2) The "status" column is depending on any one or a combination of the
> condition columns
> Say, do I have a status of "1" whenever condition 2 & 3 (or only condition
> 2) are met ?
> 
> Do you know what type of analysis one can use to do that ?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> P
> 
> 
> dput(df)
> structure(list(status = c(0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L), cond.1 = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
> 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L,
> 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L), cond.2 = c(1L,
> 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
> 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
> 1L), cond.3 = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L,
> 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L), cond.4 = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L,
> 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L), cond.5 = c(0L, 0L,
> 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
> 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L,
> 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L
> )), .Names = c("status", "cond.1", "cond.2", "cond.3", "cond.4",
> "cond.5"), row.names = c(NA, -50L), class = "data.frame")
> 

with(df, table(status=status, comb23 = cond.2&cond.3)  )
      comb23
status FALSE TRUE
     0    33    1
     1    11    5

The more general approach to analyzing binary responses is logistic regression.

-- David.
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/dependent-column-s-in-data-frame-tp4685561.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA




More information about the R-help mailing list