[R] SOLVED: evaluate NA to FALSE instead of NA?

S Ellison S.Ellison at LGCGroup.com
Tue Oct 14 13:41:09 CEST 2014


> Thanks Joshua and Sven - I completely forgot about which() .
Also 
na.omit(p[p<=0.05])

#and
p[p<=0.05 & !is.na(p)]

S.



*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}



More information about the R-help mailing list