[R] VIF threshold implying multicollinearity

[John Kane]

+1
I, originally,  read it as a stringent criticism of the first paper.

John Kane
Kingston ON Canada


> -----Original Message-----
> From: r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
> Sent: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:12:43 +1200
> To: cflynch at ncsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [R] VIF threshold implying multicollinearity
> 
> 
> On 27/07/15 13:36, Collin Lynch wrote:
> 
>> The following sources discuss the issues generally and may be a goof
>> pointer to the literature ...
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> I think that the foregoing merits fortune status! :-)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Rolf
> 
> --
> Technical Editor ANZJS
> Department of Statistics
> University of Auckland
> Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!