[R] [FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior
r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
Fri May 19 14:13:56 CEST 2017
On 20/05/17 00:01, Jérémie Juste wrote:
> Rolf said,
> TRUE & FALSE is FALSE but TRUE & TRUE is TRUE, so TRUE & NA could be
> either TRUE or FALSE and consequently is NA.
> OTOH FALSE & (anything) is FALSE so FALSE & NA is FALSE.
> According to this logic why is
> FALSE & NA
>  FALSE
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
More information about the R-help